October 5, 2008
Soriano Can't Quite Put His Finger On It...
Alfonso Soriano had some insightful comments after the crap-fest that was the NLDS.
"We're a very good team for 161 games, but we don't do nothing after that. That's the difference. We're not put together for (a short series)."
That's an excellent point. This team is not put together for a short series. What are some things that you'd want in a team put together for a short series? Let's see...
- A leadoff hitter who gets on base and creates scoring opportunities? Yeah, you'd definitely want that. The Dodgers certainly had one, with Rafael Furcal sporting a .467 on-base percentage for the series. Unfortunately for the Cubs, their leadoff 'hitter' had a .071 on-base percentage.
- A corner outfielder with some power? Yeah, that'd probably be good too. The Dodgers certainly thought so, with Manny Ramirez hitting 2 home runs in 3 games en route to a series slugging percentage of 1.100. Unfortunately for the Cubs, their 'power hitting' left fielder had no extra-base hits, or home runs, or even walks for that matter.
- Good clutch hitting? That's something you definitely need in the playoffs. Like if your team was down by 2 runs in the 9th and a player came to bat with the entire season on the line, you wouldn't want that player to record strike 3 on a pitch that was bouncing in the dirt -- at least you wouldn't want that on a "team put together for a short series."
- Your best players to step-up? No doubt that would be helpful. Like if you had an All-Star player who was signed to a $136 million contract, for example. A team that was "put together for a short series" would probably have a player like that step-up when the team needed him the most. On a team that's "not built for a short series", that player would probably have a lifetime batting average of .213 in the playoffs, or something like that.
Yeah, I think Alfonso is really on to something here. This team is clearly not put together for a short series. I wonder how that could be rectified?
Labels: Alfonso Soriano, Chicago Cubs
Discussion
8 Comments on "Soriano Can't Quite Put His Finger On It..."
#1
Posted by <img src="http://www.blogge, October 5, 2008 6:45 PM
Just curious, other than Carlos Zambrano which Cubs player did step up in the NLDS this year?Hmmm, I guess none would be the correct answer. I was disappointed by Soriano's performance and every other position player. There is plenty of blame to go around. Of course, because Jim Hendry decided to give Soriano a contract that he probably isn't capable of performing up to, let's pile on him. This idea that since a player is paid x amount, he then has to carry the team, is garbage. This short 3 game span was a failure of this organization on the whole. I will throw Lou into the mix as well, he managed with zero expediency. He didn't seem to manage each game as if it was a must win. He seemed to just assume his players were going to eventually get the job done and they never did.
#2
Posted by <img src="http://www.blogger.c, October 5, 2008 7:52 PM
how can it be rectified?You get lucky and win. Short series are such a small sample it's a waste of time to even look at the numbers. And to blame the loss on Soriano as you seem to be doing is just so typical of Cubs fans it makes me want to puke that I am associated with them.
#3
Posted by <img src="http://www.blogge, October 5, 2008 8:22 PM
It's also interesting how much weight people give to players' quotes after they have just lost. It's like fans expect these guys to come up with some profound insight as to why they failed. There is no way players can explain away what happened and what would be the point? I would imagine that most if not all of these players were a bit in shock after having been eliminated so quickly and probably not at their most eloquent. I will give every player on that roster the benefit of believing they gave their best effort to succeed. No doubt certain players are expected to do more and when they don't certain fans expect them to be able to come up with an explanation as to why.
#4
Posted by <img src="http://www.blogge, October 5, 2008 9:06 PM
Oooookay... can't comment on the playoff games because they're too small a sample size and the outcomes are determined by random chance. And can't comment on the players quotes afterward because they're upset and tired and there is no point to them anyway. Got it.
#5
Posted by <img src="http://www.blogge, October 5, 2008 9:13 PM
The great thing is you can always throw Soriano under the bus no matter what the situation.
#6
Posted by <img src="http://www.blogge, October 5, 2008 9:40 PM
And you can always defend him. God bless America.
#7
Posted by <img src="http://www.blogger.c, October 5, 2008 11:07 PM
I didn't say you couldn't comment because of small sample size, but how about referencing it? Not mentioning it implies that you believe those numbers (all of 3 games) have some value beyond, well, what could happen in a 3-game stretch. You used those numbers as if to say the Cubs need to improve because those numbers are bad. They are bad. Undoubtedly, but it's 3 games. 3 games worth of data is next to useless. It would be like knocking on 3 doors in the Chicago area and asking them if they were Republican or Democrat and then saying what the entire city of Chicago's political affiliation is based on those 3 houses. Meaningless.Everybody has commented on it, Sarge. Me, you, and many, many other people, but when someone says something that's questionable, people should call them out on it. So comment all you want, but don't expect me or melissa or others not to comment on what you've written.
#8
Posted by <img src="http://www.blogger.c, October 6, 2008 11:39 PM
it's not a 3 game sample...it is now a 6 game sample.






















Leave a comment